Sorry for my late reply; I've been in the MPI Forum and Open MPI engineering
meetings all week. Some points:
1. Yes, it would be a shame to lose all the Windows support that Shiqing did.
2. Microsoft has told me that they're of the mindset "the more, the merrier"
for their platform (i.e., they
I can probably fix the 1.6.3 build. I think it's just bumping CMake
support and tweaks so that VS2012 works. But yeah, it looks a bit grim
going forward.
Damien
On 07/12/2012 8:28 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Sorry for my late reply; I've been in the MPI Forum and Open MPI engineering
meetings
All
Let me reiterate my (minimal, compared to other developers) support to the
OpenMPI project. If all it takes is to build and run regression tests on a
platform to add a feather in the cap, I am willing to do it.
The low interest in Windows platform does not surprise me; most HPC
infrastructure
I would be disappointed to see the Windows support go away. I use it
mostly for debugging, but it's valuable to me for that purpose.
- Jeff Cummings
From: Durga Choudhury
To: Open MPI Users
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: 12/07/2012 11:33 AM
Subject:Re: [OMPI users
Hi Brock,
Le 12/06/2012 05:10 PM, Brock Palen a écrit :
Eric,
You are correct, our builds do not show lustre support:
MCA io: information "io_romio_user_configure_params" (value:, data
source: default value)
surprise! ;-)
So to enable this, when I build OpenMPI I should pass:
--with-io-
Thanks!
So it looks like most OpenMPI builds out there are running with ROMIO's that
are obvious to any optimizations to what they are running on.
I have added this to our build notes so we get it in next time. Thanks!
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
CAEN Advanced Computing
bro...@umich.e
