Hi Ralf,
sorry to bother you again,
I've download the new beta version: *OpenMPI-1.5.3*
and it seems to me that the bug fix for spawn_multiple with more than 128
cpus is not there,
am I correct ?
Thanks,
Federico.
2011/3/14 Ralph Castain
> You can try running it as suggested here:
>
> http:/
Dear open-mpi users:
I come across a little problem when running a MPI C program compiled with
Open MPI 1.4.3. A part of codes as follows:
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &numprocs);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &myid);
MPI_Get_processor_name(processor_name,
On 03/29/2011 01:29 PM, Meilin Bai wrote:
> Dear open-mpi users:
>
> I come across a little problem when running a MPI C program compiled
> with Open MPI 1.4.3. A part of codes as follows:
>
> MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
> MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &numprocs);
> MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_CO
hi all,
mpiCC -openmp test.c -o test . I fixed the error I had before. I
bump into new question.
I attached my question at http://pastebin.com/63Gy854H
thanks
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Your program is invalid for several reasons - try correcting
This was fixed with
--mca btl_tcp_if_exclude lo,eth0,vmnet0,vmnet1,vmnet8.
The machines were trying to connect through virtual connections on the machine.
Thanks!
From: atexannamed...@hotmail.com
To: us...@open-mpi.org
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:43:42 -0600
So it means that MPI doesn't suit to interactive programming? Though we can
really use fflush(stdout) to get the right order, it takes too more time,
and it's said that using fflush() is not a good progrmming style in C.
On the other hand, in Fortran language, this situation won't exist. Maybe it
