I had this leak with OpenMPI 1.4.2
But in my case, there is no accumulation - when i repeat the same call,
no additional leak is reported for the second call
Jody
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> There is no OMPI 2.5 - do you mean 1.5?
>
> On Oct 17, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Bri
On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:41 AM, jody wrote:
> I had this leak with OpenMPI 1.4.2
>
> But in my case, there is no accumulation - when i repeat the same call,
> no additional leak is reported for the second call
That's because it grabs a larger-than-required chunk of memory just in case you
call ag
Fixed. Thanks!
On Oct 16, 2010, at 1:06 AM, Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
> In the online man page for this function, MPI_MODE_SEQENTIAL should be
> MPI_MODE_SEQUENTIAL. Also,
> http://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v1.4/man3/MPI_File_open.3.php is showing man page
> source code rather than the rendered t
But shouldn't something like this show up in the other processes as well?
I only see that in the master process, but the slave processes also
send data to each other and to the master.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:41 AM, jody wrote:
>
>> I had t
I would guess that the difference is because the master process is
communicating to multiple slaves, which causes it to need more memory, so that
eventually it has to go get more than the initial block we allocated at startup
- but the slaves, talking only to one process, never exceed the initia
