Keep in mind that MPI says you do have to eventually receive the
message -- so just checking if it's there is not enough (eventually).
Iprobe is definitely one way. You could also post a non-blocking
receive (persistent or not) and MPI_TEST to see if it has completed.
However, if the mess
On Oct 1, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Blosch, Edwin L wrote:
Are there are tuning parameters than I can use to reduce the amount
of memory used by OpenMPI? I would very much like to use OpenMPI
instead of MVAPICH, but I’m on a cluster where memory usage is the
most important consideration. Here are
On Oct 1, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Blesson Varghese wrote:
The following is the information regarding the error. I am running
Open MPI 1.2.5 on Ubuntu 4.2.4, kernel version 2.6.24
Is there any chance that you can upgrade to the Open MPI v1.3 series?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
Bus error usually means that there was an invalid address passed as a
pointer somewhere in the code -- it's not usually a communications
error.
Without more information, it's rather difficult to speculate on what
happened here. Did you get corefiles? If so, are there useful
backtraces a
On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:58 AM, wrote:
> Open MPI should just "figure it out" and do the Right Thing at run-
> time -- is that not happening?
you are right it should.
But I want to exclude any traffic from OpenMPI communications, like
NFS, traffic from other jobs and so on.
And use only specia
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 07:05 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> That being said, if you just want to send a quick "notify" that an
> event has occurred, you might want to use a specific tag and/or
> communicator for these extraordinary messages. Then, when the event
> occurs, send a very short mess