On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
3. get a multi-node allocation and run "pbsdsh echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
and see what libs you are defaulting to on the other nodes.
Be careful with this one; you want to ensure that your local shell
doesn't expand $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and simply
Good point.
Other thing you might consider (though it is unlikely to be part of
this problem) is upgrading to 1.3.3. It probably isn't a good idea to
be using a release candidate for anything serious.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Ralph Ca
You can avoid the "library confusion problem" by building 64 bit and 32 bit
version of openMPI in two different directories and then use mpi-selector
(on your head and compute nodes) to switch between the two.
Just my $0.02
Jim
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:
Hi
I'm sorry if the answer to my question is very simple, but I'm really
confused with this situation.
I got a program that now contains 1 master and 1 slave processes. Master
process sends few similar chars to the slave process with this:
for (unsigned i = 0; i < SomeVariable; i++) {
Hi,
you do not send the trailing '0' which is used to determine the
stringlength. I assume that chdata[i] has at least length 5 (otherwise
you overrun your memory). Replace the "4" by "5" in MPI_Isend and
MPI_Recv and everything should work (If I get the problem right).
Dorian.
Alexey Soko
Eugene Loh wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
Eugene Loh wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
For my MPI application, each process reads a file and for each line
sends a message (MPI_Send) to one of the other processes determined
by the contents of that line. Each process posts a single MPI_Irecv
and uses
Shaun Jackman wrote:
2 calls MPI_Test. No message is waiting, so 2 decides to send.
2 sends to 0 and does not block (0 has one MPI_Irecv posted)
3 calls MPI_Test. No message is waiting, so 3 decides to send.
3 sends to 1 and does not block (1 has one MPI_Irecv posted)
0 calls MPI_Test. No messag
Hi Prasadcse,
At each iteration, each process chooses one other process to send to
(based on the line it has just read from a file). If we send the
number of packets to expect in advance, we then need to send an
`expect zero packets from me' message to all the processes that we
don't have a m
Eugene Loh wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
2 calls MPI_Test. No message is waiting, so 2 decides to send.
2 sends to 0 and does not block (0 has one MPI_Irecv posted)
3 calls MPI_Test. No message is waiting, so 3 decides to send.
3 sends to 1 and does not block (1 has one MPI_Irecv posted)
0 calls
