George -- you had a commit after this (r20123) -- did that fix the
problem?
On Dec 12, 2008, at 8:14 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Dorian,
I looked into this again. So far I can confirm that the datatype is
correctly created, and always contain the correct values
(internally). If instead of
Harold --
Along those lines, would you mind downloading a nightly trunk tarball
and giving it a whirl to see if the IOF patch we have soaking does fix
the problem in your environment? Part of the difficulty we've had in
testing the patch is that the problem was only intermittently
repeat
No. It fixes an issue when correctly rebuilding (i.e. with the real
displacements) the data-type on the remote side, but it didn't fix the
wrong values problem.
george.
On Dec 13, 2008, at 07:59 , Jeff Squyres wrote:
George -- you had a commit after this (r20123) -- did that fix the
pro
