users-boun...@open-mpi.org schrieb am 08/06/2008 07:44:03 PM:
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Jan Ploski wrote:
>
> >> I'm using the latest of Open MPI compiled with debug turned on, and
> >> valgrind 3.3.0. From your trace it looks like there is a conflict
> >> between two memory managers. I'm
I can't speak for Jeff, but my understanding of the changes for 1.3
should allow you to switch off the memory manager when running your
checks.
It seems to me an obvious interim solution would be to have two versions
of OpenMPI installed, one with and one without the memory manager. Use
one for d
users-boun...@open-mpi.org schrieb am 08/07/2008 09:27:39 AM:
> I can't speak for Jeff, but my understanding of the changes for 1.3
> should allow you to switch off the memory manager when running your
> checks.
>
> It seems to me an obvious interim solution would be to have two versions
> of Ope
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Jan Ploski wrote:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2008/07/6161.php
Thanks for this explanation. According to what you wrote,
--without-memory-manager can make my and other applications run
significantly slower.
*If* they continually re-use the s
Sorry I dropped attention on this thread; Ralph posted a reply earlier
but it got rejected because he's not a member of the list. Here's his
reply.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ralf Wildenhues
Date: August 4, 2008 2:53:49 PM EDT
To: Jeff Squyres
Cc: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI u
Jeff Squyres wrote:
Sorry I dropped attention on this thread; Ralph posted a reply earlier
but it got rejected because he's not a member of the list. Here's his
reply.
I will coordinate with Ralf and try to add Lahey support to Libtool.
Craig
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ralf Wilde
I think a better approach than using NFS-root or LiveCDs is to use Perceus in
this situation, since it has been developed over many years to handle this
sort of thing (diskless/stateless beowulf clusters):
http://www.perceus.org/
It leverages PXE booting so all you need to do on a per-node basis
You are correct in assuming the Windows nodes are DHCP. However,
while the cluster is in operation I can (if needed) remove the
connection to the rest of the world at the switch. Then introducing a
(new) DHCP server doesn't cause a conflict. I wouldn't want other
computers on the network (that a
On Thursday, 07 August 2008, at 15:03:24 (-0400),
Tim Mattox wrote:
> I think a better approach than using NFS-root or LiveCDs is to use Perceus in
> this situation, since it has been developed over many years to handle this
> sort of thing (diskless/stateless beowulf clusters):
> http://www.per
