Re: [OMPI users] Configure fails with icc 10.1.008

2007-12-10 Thread David Gunter
A quick reading of this thread makes it sound to me as if you are using icc to compile c++ code. The correct compiler to use is icpc. This has been the case since at least the version 9 release of the Intel compilers. icc will not compile c++ code. Hope this is useful. -david -- David G

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.2.4 verbosity w.r.t. osc pt2pt

2007-12-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Oct 16, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Brian Granger wrote: Wow, that is quite a study of the different options. I will spend some time looking over things to better understand the (complex) situation. I will also talk with Lisandro Dalcin about what he thinks the best approach is for mpi4py. Brian /

[OMPI users] Question about issue with use of multiple IB ports

2007-12-10 Thread Craig Tierney
I just built OpenMPI-1.2.4 to work on my system (IB, OFED-1.2). When I run a job, I am getting the following message: WARNING: There are more than one active ports on host 'w74', but the default subnet GID prefix was detected on more than one of these ports. If these ports are connected to

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.2.4 verbosity w.r.t. osc pt2pt

2007-12-10 Thread Brian Granger
I don't think this will be a problem. We are now setting the flags correctly and doing a dlopen, which should enable the components to find everything in libmpi.so. If I remember correctly this new change would simply make all components compiled in a consistent way. I will run this by Lisandro

Re: [OMPI users] Question about issue with use of multiple IB ports

2007-12-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 10, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Craig Tierney wrote: I just built OpenMPI-1.2.4 to work on my system (IB, OFED-1.2). When I run a job, I am getting the following message: WARNING: There are more than one active ports on host 'w74', but the default subnet GID prefix was detected on more than on

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.2.4 verbosity w.r.t. osc pt2pt

2007-12-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ok. I was planning to do this for OMPI v1.3 and above; not really planning to do this for the OMPI v1.2 series. We don't have an exact timeframe for OMPI v1.3 yet -- best guesses at this point is that it'll be somewhere in 1HCY08. On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Brian Granger wrote: I don