Hi Ralph:
Thanks for your information. You said I could ask more so I am! See
below.
Ralph Castain wrote On 03/30/06 16:51,:
Hi Rolf
I apologize for the scarce documentation - we are working on it, but
have a ways to go. I've tried to address your questions below. Please
feel free to a
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Vandevaart
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:43 PM
> To: us...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: [OMPI users] General ORTE questions
>
> 6. From what I can tell, there is no way to speci
Hi Rolf
See below!
Rolf Vandevaart wrote:
Hi Ralph:
Thanks for your information. You said I could ask more so I am! See
below.
Ralph Castain wrote On 03/30/06 16:51,:
Hi Rolf
I apologize for the scarce documentation - we are working on it, but
have a ways to go. I've trie
Hi folks
Just as an FYI: HPCWire has released a Q&A article on OpenRTE in
today's edition. You can access it at
http://www.hpcwire.com/hpc/608536.html.
Ralph
I have an algorithm that collects information in a tree like manner using
nonblocking communication. Some nodes do not receive information from other
nodes, so there are no outstanding requests on those nodes. On all
processors, I check for the incoming messages using MPI_Testsome().
MPI_Testsom
When we're checking the arguments, we check for the request array to
not be NULL without looking to the number of requests. I think it
make sense, as I don't see why the user would call these functions
with 0 requests ... But, the other way around make sense too. As I
don't find anything in
Compiling revision 9505 of the trunk and building my original test code now
core dumps. I can run the test code with the Testsome line commented out.
Here is the output from a brief gdb session:
--
gdb a.out /cores/core.28141
GNU gdb 6.
