Hello,
This has been an interesting discussion to follow. Here are my thoughts
on the RPM packaging...
On 6/16/05, Jeff Squyres wrote:
[snip]
> We've also got the "announce" mailing list -- a low volume list just
> for announcing new releases (and *exciting* messages about products you
> might b
Please paste the quoted text (appropriately expanded)
into a readme or install or some other prominent doc location/appendix
as soon as possible if it isn't there already.
Details like this matter a lot to a few of us,
and many of us haven't drunk completely the 3000 gallons of twisted logic
that
Having been a vict^H^H^H^Hproducer of rpms for hpc apps,
and from what i've seen of your installed files (which isn't an
extremely large set) I vote as follows:
1) all-in-one. given the current state of HPC, nearly all "users"
are also developers.
2) I'm in favor of source rpms, most particularl
'tis already in the README.
Someday we'll have nice glossy PDF's like LAM, but for the beta, the
README is what you get. :-)
On Jun 17, 2005, at 1:11 PM, Ben Allan wrote:
Please paste the quoted text (appropriately expanded)
into a readme or install or some other prominent doc location/app
