On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Brian Barrett wrote:
> Make any sense?
Makes a lot of sense. Thank you !
--
Bogdan Costescu
IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY
Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 886
I don't care if it even compiles, I would just like to evaluate the design.
-Larry
SiCortex
On Jun 15, 2005, at 9:34 PM, Jonathan Day wrote:
Phew! I'd no idea my questions would create nearly
that kind of level of response on the list. I should
post more often! :)
Please do. :-)
In all honesty, no one likes getting negative feedback, but hey, if
it's on the mark, then it's good fe
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:27:58PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2005, at 7:02 PM, Ben Allan wrote:
>
> Ah -- I thought that that would be a different issue (I presume you're
> speaking of the compile/lib flags command, like gnome-config et
> al.)...? Are you saying that the compile/l
> > It takes time to incorporate a new mpi implementation (and yet
> > another set of awful build requirement peculiarities) into a
> > a package like mine that is expected to be portable and to cope
> > seamlessly with every mpi that comes along.
>
> What is your tool, BTW?
Well, several. Primar
Ben Allan writes:
> I tried that just now and it doesn't look different. Will check your
> other mail (which apparently i haven't reached yet in the mail reader).
> I take that back, apparently -parseable isn't recognized but -parsable
> is. A :-separated output results. tolerable. :)
> Kudos to y
Hi,
Just a couple of additional thoughts. First off, when
Open MPI officially goes gold, I would suggest one of
the developers puts up a listing on Freshmeat, as
there are a lot of academics using that to track
projects these days.
Secondly, it's great that Open MPI is going to use a
CPAN-like ar
On Jun 16, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Ben Allan wrote:
Ah -- I thought that that would be a different issue (I presume you're
speaking of the compile/lib flags command, like gnome-config et
al.)...? Are you saying that the compile/lib flags should be
accessible from ompi_info in a fine-grained fashion a
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:33:51PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Ben Allan wrote:
>
> The only reason to have something like ompiConf.sh is to use the
> frameworks that already exist (like the gnome-conf thingy). I was only
> tossing that out as an example -- I didn'
On Jun 16, 2005, at 7:10 PM, Ben Allan wrote:
The *only* flag that mpicc (and friends) recognizes is --showme.
*Everything* else is passed to the underlying compiler. We didn't
want
to take the chance, for example, that --help was actually a valid flag
for the underlying compiler.
So is thi
On Jun 16, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Day wrote:
Just a couple of additional thoughts. First off, when
Open MPI officially goes gold, I would suggest one of
the developers puts up a listing on Freshmeat, as
there are a lot of academics using that to track
projects these days.
Will do.
We've a
11 matches
Mail list logo
