On 8 May 2014 16:59, Rob Latham wrote:
>
> Richard: may I add this test case to ROMIO's test suite? I'm always on
> the hunt for small self-contained tests.
>
Please do. I'm glad it's being so useful - it seems to be hitting a
surprising amount of bugs of different origins.
It might be an idea
I read the MPICH trac ticket you pointed to and your analysis seems pertinent.
The impact of my patch for “count = 0” has a similar outcome to yours: removed
all references to the datatype if the count was zero, without looking fo the
special markers.
Let me try to come up with a fix.
Thanks,
On 05/07/2014 11:36 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Thanks for the bug report and the test case.
I've opened MPICH bug (bec
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Richard: may I add this test case to ROMIO's test suite? I'm always on
the hunt for small self-contained tests.
I
On 05/07/2014 11:36 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Thanks for the bug report and the test case.
I've opened MPICH bug (bec
On 7 May 2014 16:25, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>
> "Periodically".
>
> Hopefully, the fix will be small and we can just pull that one fix down to
> OMPI.
Okay, thanks for letting me know Jeff.
Richard
On 7 May 2014 17:48, Rob Latham wrote:
>
> Looks like I fixed that late last year. A slew of ">31 bit transfers"
> fixes went into the MPICH-3.1 release. Slurping those changes, which are
> individually small (using some _x versions of type-inquiry routines here,
> some MPI_Count promotions the
On 05/07/2014 03:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Thanks Rob. I'll keep track of it over there. How often do updated
versions of ROMIO get pulled over from MPICH into OpenMPI?
On a slightly related note, I think I heard that you had fixed the 32bit
issues in ROMIO that were causing it to break when
On May 7, 2014, at 4:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Thanks Rob. I'll keep track of it over there. How often do updated versions
> of ROMIO get pulled over from MPICH into OpenMPI?
"Periodically".
Hopefully, the fix will be small and we can just pull that one fix down to OMPI.
> On a slightly re
Thanks Rob. I'll keep track of it over there. How often do updated versions
of ROMIO get pulled over from MPICH into OpenMPI?
On a slightly related note, I think I heard that you had fixed the 32bit
issues in ROMIO that were causing it to break when reading more than 2 GB
(i.e. http://www.open-mpi
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hello,
I think I've come across a bug when using ROMIO to read in a 2D
distributed array. I've attached a test case to this email.
Thanks for the bug report and the test case.
I've opened MPICH bug (because this is ROMIO's fault, not OpenMPI's
fa
11 matches
Mail list logo
