Re: [OMPI users] OpenMP + OMPI

2008-01-29 Thread George Bosilca
The rank 0 received SIGTERM ... I wonder how this happens. Usually, we don't just send SIGTERM around without a good reason. One of these reasons might be that we detected a segfault, but then there is some output. Is that the complete output you get from your run ? Thanks, george.

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMP + OMPI

2008-01-29 Thread Stephen Wornom
George Bosilca wrote: Both cases should work just fine. In fact as long as there is only one execution flow using MPI functions, the user will not face any problems. I compiled my mpi fortran code using the -mp option to verify that the mpi code would still run. I get this message when I run

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMP + OMPI

2008-01-12 Thread Brock Palen
Thanks Brock Palen Center for Advanced Computing bro...@umich.edu (734)936-1985 On Jan 12, 2008, at 10:20 PM, George Bosilca wrote: Both cases should work just fine. In fact as long as there is only one execution flow using MPI functions, the user will not face any problems. In a non-thr

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMP + OMPI

2008-01-12 Thread George Bosilca
Both cases should work just fine. In fact as long as there is only one execution flow using MPI functions, the user will not face any problems. In a non-threaded build, there is no real progress outside the MPI calls. Here by real progress I understand MPI request progress, something that i