OK, finally got it. MPI_WAITALL gets MPI_STATUSES_IGNORE, but MPI_WAITANY gets
MPI_STATUS_IGNORE. I'm otherwise familiar with just MPI_WAIT.
Thanks again!
- Ted
On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Ted Mansell wrote:
>>
>> That was a fa
On Jul 27, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Ted Mansell wrote:
>
> That was a fast response! Of course, it's not my code :).
:-)
> I had looked at the arguments and thought they were OK, but eventually
> noticed that the fourth argument is supposed to be an *array* of statuses.
> Apparently passing 'MPI_STA
That was a fast response! Of course, it's not my code :). I had looked at the
arguments and thought they were OK, but eventually noticed that the fourth
argument is supposed to be an *array* of statuses. Apparently passing
'MPI_STATUS_IGNORE' there did not cause a problem for the 'mpif.h' interf
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Ted Mansell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a compile-time error on MPI_WAITALL and MPI_WAITANY when using
> "use mpi":
>
> parcel.f90(555): error #6285: There is no matching specific subroutine for
> this generic subroutine call. [MPI_WAITANY]
> call
