On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Axel Schweiger wrote:
I'm afraid, I'm not familiar enough to dive into it. I suspect
between the fact we have a working MPI
implementation (MPICH) and the fact the this version of the pop
model is superceded, it is probably
not worth the effort to spend a lot of
Jeff,
I'm afraid, I'm not familiar enough to dive into it. I suspect between
the fact we have a working MPI
implementation (MPICH) and the fact the this version of the pop model
is superceded, it is probably
not worth the effort to spend a lot of time on it.
I was hoping that this was maybe
On Jan 22, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Axel Schweiger wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Yes POP 1.2 is dead w.r.t. development but our
application still uses it. The 1.2 to 2.0 transition
involves a lot of physical differences and for a while at least we are
stuck with 1.2.
Gotcha.
Can't say if there is
Jeff,
Thanks for your reply. Yes POP 1.2 is dead w.r.t. development but our
application still uses it. The 1.2 to 2.0 transition
involves a lot of physical differences and for a while at least we are
stuck with 1.2.
Can't say if there is a bug that was fixed since there was a lot of
re-engine
Looking at the web page for POP (http://climate.lanl.gov/Models/POP/
index.shtml), it looks like POP 1.2 is pretty ancient. I gather from
your text that later versions work ok ("POP 2").
My first guess -- knowing nothing about the POP code itself -- is
that there is a bug in the POP 1.2 cod
