On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Robert Kubrick wrote:
However from an application point of view I see an odd result here.
On the sender side I can use a buffered send to "queue" messages for
delivery and decide how many messages my buffer should contain
before the MPI_Bsend blocks if it's runn
Hi Robert
Dick Treumann - MPI Team
IBM Systems & Technology Group
Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363
users-boun...@open-mpi.org wrote on 08/27/2008 11:55:58 AM:
<< snip >>
>
> However from an application point of vie
discarding
the data is abort the job.
Dick Treumann - MPI Team
IBM Systems & Technology Group
Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363
users-boun...@open-mpi.org wrote on 08/27/2008 08:41:59 AM:
> [image removed]
>
>
455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363
users-boun...@open-mpi.org wrote on 08/27/2008 08:41:59 AM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: [OMPI users] MPI_Brecv vs multiple MPI_Irecv
>
> Robert Kubrick
>
> to:
>
> Open MPI Users
>
>
Interesting, MPI_Brecv is not in the standard (MPI_Bsend is). I don't
understand why a recv could not implemented with an external buffer.
Anyway, my bad, I was assuming MPI_Brecv was on. Thanks George for
pointing this out.
On Aug 27, 2008, at 7:14 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
What is the def
What is the definition of a buffered receive ?
george.
On Aug 26, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Robert Kubrick wrote:
From a performance point of view, which one is better:
MPI_Battach(10*sizeof(MSG))
MPI_Brecv()
or
MPI_recv_init()
MPI_recv_init()
MPI_recv_init()
... /* 10 recv handlers */
MPI_Start
