Sadly, lama has fallen into a stale, unsupported condition. I’ve been thinking
about your mapping request, and I don’t currently see a way to do it with the
existing options. I understand the request, however, and will see if I can come
up with something over the weekend.
> On Feb 12, 2016, at
We've also tested lama with
-np 10 --mca rmaps_base_verbose 10 --mca rmaps_lama_priority 91 --mca
rmaps_lama_map sNbnch --mca rmaps_lama_bind 1h --mca rmaps_lama_mppr 1:c,5:s
It seems like this would do the right thing except a priority < 10 does
nothing and greater than 10 segfaults. Is lama st
