Yes, sadly the terminology is badly overloaded at this stage :-(
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 9:20 AM, John Hearns wrote:
>
> Thankyou Ralph. i guess the information I did not have in my head was that
> core = physical core (not hyperthreaded core)
>
> On 18 July 2016 at 14:45, Ralph Castain
Thankyou Ralph. i guess the information I did not have in my head was
that core = physical core (not hyperthreaded core)
On 18 July 2016 at 14:45, Ralph Castain wrote:
> It sounds like you just want to bind procs to cores since each core is
> composed of 2 HTs. So a simple “--map-by core --b
It sounds like you just want to bind procs to cores since each core is composed
of 2 HTs. So a simple “--map-by core --bind-to core" should do the trick.
FWIW: the affinity settings are controlled by the bind-to option. You can
use “mpirun -h” to get the list of supported options and a little