On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:04 AM, David Turner wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
>> Which version of OMPI are you using? We know that the 1.2 series was
>> unreliable about removing the session directories, but 1.3 and above appear
>> to be quite good about it. If you are having problems with the 1.3 or 1.4
>>
Hi Ralph,
Which version of OMPI are you using? We know that the 1.2 series was unreliable
about removing the session directories, but 1.3 and above appear to be quite
good about it. If you are having problems with the 1.3 or 1.4 series, I would
definitely like to know about it.
When I was at
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:41 AM, David Turner wrote:
> On 3/1/10 1:51 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Which version of OMPI are you using? We know that the 1.2 series was
>> unreliable about removing the session directories, but 1.3 and above appear
>> to be quite good about it. If you are having proble
On 3/1/10 1:51 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Which version of OMPI are you using? We know that the 1.2 series was unreliable
about removing the session directories, but 1.3 and above appear to be quite
good about it. If you are having problems with the 1.3 or 1.4 series, I would
definitely like to
Which version of OMPI are you using? We know that the 1.2 series was unreliable
about removing the session directories, but 1.3 and above appear to be quite
good about it. If you are having problems with the 1.3 or 1.4 series, I would
definitely like to know about it.
When I was at LANL, I ran
Hi all,
Running on a large cluster of 8-core nodes. I understand
that the SM BTL is a "good thing". But I'm curious about
its use of memory-mapped files. I believe these files will
be in $TMPDIR, which defaults to /tmp.
In our cluster, the compute nodes are stateless, so /tmp
is actually in R
