mpletes, you could use a barrier or other MPI
method to determine it.
> I appreciate your time.
>
> From: r...@open-mpi.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:55:59 -0700
> To: us...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external programon same
> processor
From: r...@open-mpi.org
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:24:32 -0700
To: us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external program on sameprocessor
(Fortran)
It also would have been really helpful to know that you were using MVAPICH and
-not- Open M
on't seem to be getting anywhere.
>
> Thank you!
>
> From: r...@open-mpi.org
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:24:32 -0700
> To: us...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external program on sameprocessor
> (Fortran)
>
> It also would have been
.@open-mpi.org
List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:24:32 -0700
To: us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external program on sameprocessor
(Fortran)
It also would have been really helpful to know that you were using MVAPICH and
-not- Open MP
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 12:57 -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> Reuti wrote:
> > Are you speaking of the same?
>
> Good point, Reuti. I was thinking of a cluster scheduler like SGE or
> Torque.
Yeah, I meant the scheduler in the CPU time slice sense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduling_(computi
Reuti wrote:
> Are you speaking of the same?
Good point, Reuti. I was thinking of a cluster scheduler like SGE or
Torque.
>
> Am 03.03.2010 um 17:32 schrieb Prentice Bisbal:
>
>> Terry Frankcombe wrote:
>>> Surely this is the problem of the scheduler that your system uses,
>
> This I would also
Are you speaking of the same?
Am 03.03.2010 um 17:32 schrieb Prentice Bisbal:
Terry Frankcombe wrote:
Surely this is the problem of the scheduler that your system uses,
This I would also state.
rather than MPI?
Scheduler in the Linux kernel?
That's not true. The scheduler only assign
Terry Frankcombe wrote:
> Surely this is the problem of the scheduler that your system uses,
> rather than MPI?
That's not true. The scheduler only assigns the initial processes to
nodes and starts them. It can kill the processes it starts if they use
too much memory or run too long, but doesn't p
the current core rank, and it seems to stay distributed and separated as I
> want.
>
> Hope someone else finds this useful in the future.
>
> > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:13:01 +1100
> > Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external program on same processor
> > (Fort
to the current core rank, and it seems to stay distributed and
separated as I want.
Hope someone else finds this useful in the future.
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:13:01 +1100
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] running external program on sameprocessor
> (Fortran)
>
> Surely t
Surely this is the problem of the scheduler that your system uses,
rather than MPI?
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 00:48 +, abc def wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if someone can help.
>
> The situation is that I have an MPI-parallel fortran program. I run it
> and it's distributed on N cores, and each
Hello,
I wonder if someone can help.
The situation is that I have an MPI-parallel fortran program. I run it
and it's distributed on N cores, and each of these processes must
call an external program.
This external program is also an MPI program, however I want to run it
in serial, on the co
12 matches
Mail list logo
