, August 29, 2016 6:16 AM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] problem with exceptions in Java interface
Hi Siegmar,
I will review PR 1698 and wait some more feedback from the developers, they
might have different views than mine.
assuming PR 1698 does what you expect, it does not catch all
Hi Siegmar,
I will review PR 1698 and wait some more feedback from the developers, they
might have different views than mine.
assuming PR 1698 does what you expect, it does not catch all user errors.
for example, if you MPI_Send a buffer that is too short, the exception
might be thrown at any time
Hi Gilles,
isn't it possible to pass all exceptions from the Java interface
to the calling method? I can live with the current handling of
exceptions as well, although some exceptions can be handled
within my program and some will break my program even if I want
to handle exceptions myself. I und
Siegmar and all,
i am puzzled with this error.
on one hand, it is caused by an invalid buffer
(e.g. buffer size is 1, but user suggests size is 2)
so i am fine with current behavior (e.g.
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is thrown)
/* if that was a C program, it would very likely S
Hi,
I have installed v1.10.3-31-g35ba6a1, openmpi-v2.0.0-233-gb5f0a4f,
and openmpi-dev-4691-g277c319 on my "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
12 (x86_64)" with Sun C 5.14 beta and gcc-6.1.0. In May I had
reported a problem with Java execeptions (PR 1698) which had
been solved in June (PR 1803).
https
Hi Siegmar,
Sorry for the delay, I seem to have missed this one.
It looks like there's an error in the way the native methods are processing
java exceptions. The code correctly builds up an exception message for
cases where MPI 'c' returns non-success but, not if the problem occured
in one of th
Hi,
I tried MPI.ERRORS_RETURN in a small Java program with Open MPI
1.10.2 and master. I get the expected behaviour, if I use a
wrong value for the root process in "bcast". Unfortunately I
get an MPI or Java error message if I try to broadcast more data
than available. Is this intended or is it a
