Good point. That particular call to memalign, however, is part of a
series of OMPI memory hook tests. The memory allocated by that
memalign call is promptly freed (opal/mca/memory/ptmalloc2/
opal_ptmalloc2_component.c : line 111). The change is to silence
TotalView's memory alignment error
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 19:56 +0100, Ashley Pittman wrote:
> Simple malloc() returns pointers that are at least eight byte aligned
> anyway, I'm not sure what the reason for calling memalign() with a value
> of four would be be anyway.
That is not necessarily true on all systems.
--
Ake Sandgren,
Simple malloc() returns pointers that are at least eight byte aligned
anyway, I'm not sure what the reason for calling memalign() with a value
of four would be be anyway.
Ashley,
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 20:19 +0200, Åke Sandgren wrote:
> No it didn't. And memalign is obsolete according to the manp
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:58 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Did that make it over to the v1.3 branch?
No it didn't. And memalign is obsolete according to the manpage.
posix_memalign is the one to use.
> >
> > I think Jeff has already addressed this problem.
> >
> > https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi
Ticket created (#2040). I hope it's okay ;-).
--
Samuel K. Gutierrez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Did that make it over to the v1.3 branch?
On Oct 1, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Samuel K. Gutierrez wrote:
Hi,
I think Jeff has already addressed thi
Did that make it over to the v1.3 branch?
On Oct 1, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Samuel K. Gutierrez wrote:
Hi,
I think Jeff has already addressed this problem.
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/21744
--
Samuel K. Gutierrez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Peter
