ts/users/2014/05/24467.php>
>
> Thanks for the help,
> --Jack
>
>
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:24 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] machinefile binding error
&
i.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:24 PM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] machinefile binding error
It looks to me like some of the nodes don’t have the required numactl packages
installed. Why don’t you try launching the job without binding, just to see if
-
>
> Thanks,
> --Jack
>
>
>
>
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> <mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org>] On Behalf Of Galloway, Jack D
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 2:31 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI
n Behalf Of Ralph Castain
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:57 PM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] machinefile binding error
Ah, now that’s a “feature” :-)
Seriously, it *is* actually a new feature of the 1.8 series. We now go out and
actually sense the number of cores on the system and se
15 1:57 PM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] machinefile binding error
Ah, now that’s a “feature” :-)
Seriously, it *is* actually a new feature of the 1.8 series. We now go out and
actually sense the number of cores on the system and set the number of slots to
that value unless y
Ah, now that’s a “feature” :-)
Seriously, it *is* actually a new feature of the 1.8 series. We now go out and
actually sense the number of cores on the system and set the number of slots to
that value unless you tell us otherwise. It was something people continually
nagged us about, and so we m
I recently upgraded my CentOS kernel and am running 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64,
in this upgrade I also decided to upgrade my intel/openmpi codes.
I upgraded from:
intel version 13.1.2, with openmpi 1.6.5
intel 15.0.2, with openmpi 1.8.4
Previously a command of "mpirun -np NP -machinefile MACH ex
