> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kluskens
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:38 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] f90 module files compile a lot faster
>
> Mino
Minor suggestion, change the first sentence to read:
- The Fortran 90 MPI bindings can now be built in one of four sizes
using --with-mpi-f90-size=SIZE.
Also, Open MPI 1.2 changes the --with-mpi-param-check default from
always to runtime according to my comparison of the 1.1 README and
1.
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kluskens
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:15 AM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] f90 module files compile a lot faster
>
> Could I/
..@open-mpi.org
[mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kluskens
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:56 AM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: [OMPI users] f90 module files compile a lot faster
Strange thing, with the latest g95 and the last OpenMPI 1.1
(a3r9704)
[on OS X 10.4.6] there does not
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kluskens
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:56 AM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: [OMPI users] f90 module files compile a lot faster
>
> Strange th
Strange thing, with the latest g95 and the last OpenMPI 1.1 (a3r9704)
[on OS X 10.4.6] there does not seem to be the compilation penalty
for using "USE MPI" instead of "include mpi.h" that there used to be.
My test programs compile almost instantly.
However, I'm still seeing:
[a.b.c.d:2022
