Hi,
I can only speak to Sun's use of uDAPL as it relates to MPI.
From what I can tell Sun is the only group interested in the uDAPL BTL
in Open MPI at this point. In contrast, Open MPI has many active members
interested in the development of the OpenIB BTL which uses the user
verbs protocol.
Sorry I responded the wrong thread. Ignore my response.
On 01/07/10 09:48, Don Kerr wrote:
I will take a look today.
-DON
On 01/07/10 09:34, Jeff Squyres wrote:
This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers
behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while.
O
I will take a look today.
-DON
On 01/07/10 09:34, Jeff Squyres wrote:
This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers
behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while.
On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Nilesh Awate wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to Open MPI mailing li
This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers
behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while.
On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Nilesh Awate wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am new to Open MPI mailing list. Just started using it for our proprietary
> interconnect
>
> wh
Hi all,
I am new to Open MPI mailing list. Just started using it for our proprietary
interconnect
which uses uDAPL1.2 as underling network.
As our experience with other open source MPI2 implementation libraries, they
are deprecating udapl ADI.
and giving more n more support/enhancement to gen2
