Re: [OMPI users] debugging performance regressions between versions

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Love
"Iliev, Hristo" writes: > Hi Dave, > > Is it MPI_ALLTOALL or MPI_ALLTOALLV that runs slower? Well, the output says MPI_ALLTOALL, but this prompted me to check, and it turns out that it's lumping both together. > If it is the latter, > the reason could be that the default implementation of MPI_A

Re: [OMPI users] debugging performance regressions between versions

2013-10-21 Thread Iliev, Hristo
alf Of Dave Love > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 6:18 PM > To: us...@open-mpi.org > Subject: [OMPI users] debugging performance regressions between versions > > I've been testing an application that turns out to be ~30% slower with OMPI > 1.6.5 than (the Red Hat packaged ver

[OMPI users] debugging performance regressions between versions

2013-10-18 Thread Dave Love
I've been testing an application that turns out to be ~30% slower with OMPI 1.6.5 than (the Red Hat packaged version of) 1.5.4, with the same mca-params and the same binary, just flipping the runtime. It's running over openib, and the profile it prints says that alltoall is a factor of four slower