OK. I appreciate the suggestion and will definitely try it out.
Thanks,
Allen
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:14 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Allen Barnett wrote:
> > I
> > guess what I'm asking is if I will have to make my partitioner an
> > OpenMPI program as well?
> >
>
On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Allen Barnett wrote:
> Does OMPI say that it has IBV fork support?
> ompi_info --param btl openib --parsable | grep
have_fork_support
My RHEL4 system reports:
MCA btl: parameter "btl_openib_want_fork_support" (current value:
"-1")
MCA btl: information "b
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 12:27 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Allen Barnett wrote:
>
> > std::stringstream ss;
> > ss << "partitioner_program " << COMM_WORLD_SIZE;
> > system( ss.str().c_str() );
> >
>
> You'd probably see the same problem even if you strdup'ed the c_str()
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Allen Barnett wrote:
std::stringstream ss;
ss << "partitioner_program " << COMM_WORLD_SIZE;
system( ss.str().c_str() );
You'd probably see the same problem even if you strdup'ed the c_str()
and system()'ed that.
What kernel are you using? Does OMPI say that i
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:29 -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> fork() support in OpenFabrics has always been dicey -- it can lead to
> random behavior like this. Supposedly it works in a specific set of
> circumstances, but I don't have a recent enough kernel on my machines
> to test.
>
> It's be
