he code stack in dbx looks the same on X64 platforms as the code on
SPARC except the address is smaller on the former.
Greg, I would be interested in knowing if you are still seeing the
problem on Leopard and whether the above setting helps any.
--td
*
*Subject:* Re: [OMPI users] ScaLapack and
All,
I really didn't want to start a new thread discussing the virtues and
vices of every compiler, since this is hardly my forte and the
opportunity to offend someone is fairly high, whilst making myself
look clownish
What I should have said was that "for my organization one cannot
ju
> Intel ifort is 7.7x faster then Linux g95 on MacPro 3.0 GHz
> Intel ifort is 2.9x faster then Linux g95 on Dual Opteron 1.4 GHz
> Intel ifort is 1.8x faster then Linux g95 on SGI Altix 350 dual
> Itanium2 1.4 GHz
> OS X g95 is 2.7x faster then Linux g95 on a MacPro 2.66 GHz (same
> hardwa
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Doug Reeder wrote:
Greg,
I would disagree with your statement that the available fortran
options can't pass a cost-benefit analysis. I have found that for
scientific programming (e.g., Livermore Fortran Kernels and actual
PDE solvers) that code produced by the
.
Note, I have not confirmed this failure with a test case but the code
stack in dbx looks the same on X64 platforms as the code on SPARC
except
the address is smaller on the former.
Greg, I would be interested in knowing if you are still seeing the
problem on Leopard and whether the above setting
trying something similar with Solaris and 64-bit
on
a SPARC machine and was seeing segv's inside the MPI Library due to a
pointer being passed through an integer (thus dropping the upper 32
bits). Funny thing is it all works under Solaris on AMD64 or IA-64
platforms.
--td
Date: Thu, 28 F
e on SPARC except
the address is smaller on the former.
Greg, I would be interested in knowing if you are still seeing the
problem on Leopard and whether the above setting helps any.
--td
*
*Subject:* Re: [OMPI users] ScaLapack and BLACS on Leopard
*From:* Terry Dontje (/Terry.Dontje_at_[h
Funny thing is it all works under Solaris on AMD64 or IA-64
platforms.
--td
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:50:28 -0500
From: Gregory John Orris
Subject: [OMPI users] ScaLapack and BLACS on Leopard
To: Open MPI Users
Message-ID: <528fd4c0-6157-49cb-80e6-1c62684e4...@nrl.navy.mil>
Content
Hey Folks,
Anyone got ScaLapack and BLACS working and not just compiled under
OSX10.5 in 64-bit mode?
The FAQ site directions were followed and every thing compiles just
fine. But ALL of the single precision routines and many of the double
precisions routines in the TESTING directory fail w
