On 08/12/10 21:53, Jed Brown wrote:
Or OMPI_CC=icc-xx.y mpicc ...
If we enable a different set of run time library paths for Intel
compilers than those used to build OMPI when we compile and execute the
MPI app these new run-time libs will be accessible to OMPI libs to run
against instea
Or OMPI_CC=icc-xx.y mpicc ...
Jed
On Aug 12, 2010 5:18 PM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael E. Thomadakis wrote:
> On 08/12/10 18:59, Tim Prince wrote:
>>...
The "easy" way to accomplish this would be to:
(a) build OMPI with whatever compiler you decide to use as a
On 8/12/2010 6:04 PM, Michael E. Thomadakis wrote:
On 08/12/10 18:59, Tim Prince wrote:
On 8/12/2010 3:27 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational
reason why someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what
it would be
I'm no exp
On Aug 12, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael E. Thomadakis wrote:
> On 08/12/10 18:59, Tim Prince wrote:
>>
>> On 8/12/2010 3:27 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>
>>> Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational reason
>>> why someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what i
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 20:04 -0500, Michael E. Thomadakis wrote:
> The basic motive in this hypothetical situation is to build the MPI
> application ONCE and then swap run-time libs as newer compilers come out
Not building your application with the compiler you want to use sounds
like a very
On 08/12/10 18:59, Tim Prince wrote:
On 8/12/2010 3:27 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational
reason why someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what it
would be
I'm no expert on compiler vs lib confusion, but some of my ow
On 08/12/10 17:27, Ralph Castain wrote:
Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational
reason why someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what it
would be
I'm no expert on compiler vs lib confusion, but some of my own
experience would say that this is a ba
On 8/12/2010 3:27 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational
reason why someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what it
would be
I'm no expert on compiler vs lib confusion, but some of my own
experience would say that this is a
Ick - talk about confusing! I suppose there must be -some- rational reason why
someone would want to do this, but I can't imagine what it would be
I'm no expert on compiler vs lib confusion, but some of my own experience would
say that this is a bad idea regardless of whether or not OMPI is
Hello OpenMPI,
we have deployed OpenMPI 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on our Intel Nehalem cluster
using Intel compilers V 11.1.059 and 11.1.072 respectively, and one user
has the following request:
Can we build OpenMPI version say O.1 against Intel compilers version say
I.1 but then built an applicatio
10 matches
Mail list logo
