Re: [OMPI users] One-sided bugs

2012-12-30 Thread Jed Brown
I've resolved the problem in a satisfactory way by circumventing one-sided entirely. I.e., this issue is finally closed: https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/issue/9/implement-petscsf-without-one-sided Users can proceed anyway using the run-time option -acknowledge_ompi_onesided_bug, which will

Re: [OMPI users] One-sided bugs

2012-09-11 Thread Jed Brown
*Bump* There doesn't seem to have been any progress on this. Can you at least have an error message saying that Open MPI one-sided does not work with datatypes instead of silently causing wanton corruption and deadlock? On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > [Forgot the attachment.

Re: [OMPI users] One-sided bugs

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Brown
[Forgot the attachment.] On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 15:16, Jed Brown wrote: > I wrote a new communication layer that we are evaluating for use in mesh > management and PDE solvers, but it is based on MPI-2 one-sided operations > (and will eventually benefit from some of the MPI-3 one-sided proposal

[OMPI users] One-sided bugs

2011-12-22 Thread Jed Brown
I wrote a new communication layer that we are evaluating for use in mesh management and PDE solvers, but it is based on MPI-2 one-sided operations (and will eventually benefit from some of the MPI-3 one-sided proposals, especially MPI_Fetch_and_op() and dynamic windows). All the basic functionality