ion must
still MPI_Wait it.
Dick Treumann - MPI Team
IBM Systems & Technology Group
Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363
users-boun...@open-mpi.org wrote on 03/25/2009 07:34:06 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: [O
There are two version of probe (MPI_Probe and MPI_IProbe) but I can't
tell you off hand their details. I know when looking at them in the past
the basic understanding that I took away was the MPI_Probe is like
MPI_Test but it doesn't actually receive or deallocate the message.
From
http://ww
If an MPI_Irecv has already been posted, and a single message is sent
to the receiver, then will an MPI_Probe return that there is no
message waiting to be received? The message has already been received
by the MPI_Irecv. It's the MPI_Request object of the MPI_Irecv call
that needs to be probed
Have you tried MPI_Probe?
Justin
Shaun Jackman wrote:
Is there a function similar to MPI_Test that doesn't deallocate the
MPI_Request object? I would like to test if a message has been
received (MPI_Irecv), check its tag, and dispatch the MPI_Request to
another function based on that tag.
C
Is there a function similar to MPI_Test that doesn't deallocate the
MPI_Request object? I would like to test if a message has been
received (MPI_Irecv), check its tag, and dispatch the MPI_Request to
another function based on that tag.
Cheers,
Shaun
