Re: [OMPI users] MPI_COMM_SPAWN versus OpenMPI 1.0.1

2006-03-01 Thread Greg Lindahl
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:56:38AM -0500, George Bosilca wrote: > But, even if it was > right to do so, it should at least print a warning message to inform > me that I was stupid enough to do such basic mistakes ... Most compilers don't because they don't want to print warnings for codes whi

Re: [OMPI users] MPI_COMM_SPAWN versus OpenMPI 1.0.1

2006-03-01 Thread George Bosilca
On Mar 1, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Michael Kluskens wrote: I'm sorry I don't understand what you are saying. Are you saying that when using "free source form" Fortran 90 code that the default line length of 132 characters is ignored when compiling MPI function calls? I know for a fact this is not tr

Re: [OMPI users] MPI_COMM_SPAWN versus OpenMPI 1.0.1

2006-03-01 Thread Michael Kluskens
On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:00 PM, George Bosilca wrote: I run in the same kind of troubles few days ago with a f90 code. After banging my head against all solid objects around my office, I switched to vim (it doesn't make sense yet ...). And suddenly I saw the light !!! F90 inherit from F77 one of it

Re: [OMPI users] MPI_COMM_SPAWN versus OpenMPI 1.0.1

2006-02-28 Thread George Bosilca
I run in the same kind of troubles few days ago with a f90 code. After banging my head against all solid objects around my office, I switched to vim (it doesn't make sense yet ...). And suddenly I saw the light !!! F90 inherit from F77 one of it's most "ancient" feature. The limit on the nu

[OMPI users] MPI_COMM_SPAWN versus OpenMPI 1.0.1

2006-02-28 Thread Michael Kluskens
Using OpenMPI 1.0.1 compiled with g95 on OS X (same problem on Debian Linux with g95, I have not tested other compilers yet) mpif90 spawn.f90 -o spawn In file spawn.f90:35 MPI_COMM_WORLD, slavecomm, MPI_ERRCODES_IGNORE, ierr ) 1 Err