On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Nifty Tom Mitchell wrote:
If I recall correctly the OMPI build does not generate a full Fortran
<--> C mapping of all types for all functions. Was the reason that
the
resulting library has too many permutations and symbols to test,
build and
link to.
The OMP
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:12:24AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
>> There is currently a semi-heated debate in comp.lang.fortran
>> concerning co-arrays and the upcoming Fortran 2008. Don't
>> waste your time trying to decipher the thread; however,
On Oct 25, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
There is currently a semi-heated debate in comp.lang.fortran
concerning co-arrays and the upcoming Fortran 2008. Don't
waste your time trying to decipher the thread; however, there
appear to be a few knowledgable MPI Fortaners hang-out, lately.
W
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:01AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> If you're a Fortran MPI developer, I have a question for you.
>
> In the MPI-3 Forum, we're working on revamping the Fortran bindings to
> be "better" (for a variety of definitions of "better"). There's at
> least one question th
If you're a Fortran MPI developer, I have a question for you.
In the MPI-3 Forum, we're working on revamping the Fortran bindings to
be "better" (for a variety of definitions of "better"). There's at
least one question that we really need some feedback from the MPI
Fortran developer commun
