As far as I know, no MPI-IO is done in their LAM/MPI-based apps
-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Rob Latham
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:22 AM
To: us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] LAM/MPI -> OpenMPI
On 02/27/2015 09:40
On 02/27/2015 11:14 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
Well, perhaps it was time. We haven't changed anything about LAM/MPI in
...a decade? Now that the domain is gone, since I don't even have an
SVN checkout any more, I can't check when the last meaningful commit
was. I see Rob found a ROM
On Feb 27, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Sasso, John (GE Power & Water, Non-GE)
mailto:john1.sa...@ge.com>> wrote:
Unfortunately, we have a few apps which use LAM/MPI instead of OpenMPI (and
this is something I have NO control over).
Bummer!
I have been making an effortlonger supported and end-of-life.
On 02/27/2015 09:40 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Yeah, any other recommendations I can give to convince the
powers-that-be that immediate sun-setting of LAM/MPI would be great.
Sometimes I feel like I am trying to fit a square peg in a round holeL
Other than the fact that LAM/MPI no longer is s
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 6:42 AM, Sasso, John (GE Power & Water, Non-GE)
> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, we have a few apps which use LAM/MPI instead of OpenMPI (and
> this is something I have NO control over). I have been making an effort to
> try and convince those who handle such apps to move o
Unfortunately, we have a few apps which use LAM/MPI instead of OpenMPI (and
this is something I have NO control over). I have been making an effort to
try and convince those who handle such apps to move over to LAM/MPI as it is
(as I understand it) no longer supported and end-of-life. In fac
