Thanks for not saying this turn that Environment Modules
is "outdated and not maintained".
That might mislead the OMPI list audience,
which has a big intersection with Environment Modules users.
On May 16, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Maxime Boissonneault
wrote:
> Instead of using the outdated and not ma
The Environment Modules package user base is not negligible,
including many universities, research centers, national labs,
ans private companies, in the US and around the world.
How does the user base of LMod compare?
The user base certainly is much larger for Environment Modules than LMod.
Bu
Nobody was trying to make a statement here, Gus - I was only quoting something
based on the last known repo of which I was aware. If the modules folks moved
to Github, then they might want to make that a little more obvious. :-/
Lmod vs modules - I couldn't care less. My understanding is that TA
Hi Ralph and list
I am no developer, but my impression is that,
paraphrasing Mark Twain,
the reports about the death of the
Environment Modules (http://modules.sourceforge.net/)
package have been exaggerated.
That presumed death/obsolescence has been
repeated a few times on the OMPI list,
which h
I checked with my colleague, who is one of the
module developers. His response:
> That's a surprise to me?!
> I will admit that I'm a little slow on releases,
> but it's still quite active.
On 8/5/14 11:39 AM, Fabricio Cannini wrote:
On 05-08-2014 13:54, Ralph Castain wrote:
Check the repo -
There is also the Lmod project, based at TACC, and run by Robert McLay.
https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod
That's under current, active development, and if you'd be creating a
brand new modules infrastructure, bears a close look.
-- bennet
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Fabricio C
On 05-08-2014 13:54, Ralph Castain wrote:
Check the repo - hasn't been touched in a very long time
Yes, the cvs repo hasn't been touched in a long long time, but they have
apparently migrated to git.
cvs:
http://modules.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/modules/
git:
http://sourceforge.net/p/modul
Check the repo - hasn't been touched in a very long time
On Aug 5, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Fabricio Cannini wrote:
> On 05-08-2014 13:10, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Since modules isn't a supported s/w package any more, you might consider
>> using LMOD instead:
>>
>> https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-pro
On 05-08-2014 13:10, Ralph Castain wrote:
Since modules isn't a supported s/w package any more, you might consider using
LMOD instead:
https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod
Modules isn't supported anymore? :O
Could you please send a link about it ?
Since modules isn't a supported s/w package any more, you might consider using
LMOD instead:
https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod
On Aug 5, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Gus Correa wrote:
> Hi Ahsan
>
> Besides Andrew's excellent suggestion for the runtime environment.
>
> For the installatio
Hi Ahsan
Besides Andrew's excellent suggestion for the runtime environment.
For the installation, Open MPI configuration scripts
and Makefiles support VPATH.
Hence, you can create two separate directories to
*build* it with Gnu and Intel compilers.
Then you launch configure, make, make install f
Hi Ahsan,
We, and I think many people, use the Environment Modules software,
http://modules.sourceforge.net , to do this.
I hope that helps.
--andy
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Syed Ahsan Ali wrote:
>
>
> I want to compile openmpi with both intel and gnu compilers. How can I
> install
I want to compile openmpi with both intel and gnu compilers. How can
I install both at the same time and then specify which one to use during
job submission.
Regards
Ahsan
13 matches
Mail list logo
