Thank you, Gilles. That explains it!
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> basically, there are two methods (aka pml) to send/recv messages.
>
> ob1 is the basic one, it works with (all ?) interconnects that can
> send/recv a stream of data
>
> pml/ob1 uses the available
basically, there are two methods (aka pml) to send/recv messages.
ob1 is the basic one, it works with (all ?) interconnects that can
send/recv a stream of data
pml/ob1 uses the available btl(s) (tcp, openib, ...)
cm is for feature rich interconnects that can send/recv messages
pml/cm uses th
Thank you, but what's mxm?
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> You probably will also want to run with -mca pml ob1 to make sure mxm is
> not in use. The combination should be sufficient to force tcp usage.
>
> -Nathan
>
> > On Jul 18, 2016, at 10:50 PM, Saliya Ekanayake
> w
You probably will also want to run with -mca pml ob1 to make sure mxm is not in
use. The combination should be sufficient to force tcp usage.
-Nathan
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 10:50 PM, Saliya Ekanayake wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I read in a previous thread
> (https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/us
Hi,
I read in a previous thread (
https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/05/24475.php) that Jeff
mentions it's possible for OpenMPI to pick up the openib transport if tcp
is not requested explicitly.
So, does that mean if I do,
--mca btl ^openib
that it's still possible for OpenMPI
