Having been a vict^H^H^H^Hproducer of rpms for hpc apps,
and from what i've seen of your installed files (which isn't an
extremely large set) I vote as follows:
1) all-in-one. given the current state of HPC, nearly all "users"
are also developers.
2) I'm in favor of source rpms, most particularl
Hello,
This has been an interesting discussion to follow. Here are my thoughts
on the RPM packaging...
On 6/16/05, Jeff Squyres wrote:
[snip]
> We've also got the "announce" mailing list -- a low volume list just
> for announcing new releases (and *exciting* messages about products you
> might b
On Jun 16, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Day wrote:
Just a couple of additional thoughts. First off, when
Open MPI officially goes gold, I would suggest one of
the developers puts up a listing on Freshmeat, as
there are a lot of academics using that to track
projects these days.
Will do.
We've a
Hi,
Just a couple of additional thoughts. First off, when
Open MPI officially goes gold, I would suggest one of
the developers puts up a listing on Freshmeat, as
there are a lot of academics using that to track
projects these days.
Secondly, it's great that Open MPI is going to use a
CPAN-like ar
