Re: [O-MPI users] Correction to 'Questions about mpif90/g95'

2005-10-25 Thread Charles Williams
Hi Jeff,Recreating the problem will probably be a bit convoluted, but should be possible.  Things are also complicated by the fact that I'm using the current developers' version of petsc.  I am presently getting around the problem by reverting to an older version of g95, but I believe that this is

Re: [O-MPI users] Correction to 'Questions about mpif90/g95'

2005-10-24 Thread Jeff Squyres
We actually do not have profiling versions of the MPI_Wtick and MPI_Wtime functions -- the MPI standard says that we don't have to (indeed, in Open MPI, they're inline functions in mpi.h). I just built the PETSc tests last week with no problem, however (but on Linux, not OSX). Can you send mo

[O-MPI users] Correction to 'Questions about mpif90/g95'

2005-10-21 Thread Charles Williams
I'm sorry about my previous post. It turns out that was an experiment of mine where I created a dynamic library for libmpi_f90, which doesn't happen normally. My test example now runs, but I still have problems with PETSc: make test Running test examples to verify correct installation /Us