[OMPI users] 答复: 答复: Does multiple Irecv means concurrent receiving ?

2014-08-27 Thread Zhang,Lei(Ecom)
14年8月27日 20:39 收件人: Open MPI Users 主题: Re: [OMPI users] 答复: Does multiple Irecv means concurrent receiving ? You have a physical constraint, the capacity of your links. If you are over 90% of your network bandwidth, there is little to be improved. George. On Aug 27, 2014, at 0:18, "Zhan

[OMPI users] 答复: Does multiple Irecv means concurrent receiving ?

2014-08-27 Thread Zhang,Lei(Ecom)
rs [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] 代表 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 发送时间: 2014年8月23日 20:03 收件人: Open MPI User's List 主题: Re: [OMPI users] Does multiple Irecv means concurrent receiving ? On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:37 AM, Zhang,Lei(Ecom) wrote: > I have a performance problem with receiving. In a

[OMPI users] Does multiple Irecv means concurrent receiving ?

2014-08-20 Thread Zhang,Lei(Ecom)
I have a performance problem with receiving. In a single master thread, I made several Irecv calls: Irecv(buf1, ..., tag, ANY_SOURCE, COMM_WORLD) Irecv(buf2, ..., tag, ANY_SOURCE, COMM_WORLD) ... Irecv(bufn, ..., tag, ANY_SOURCE, COMM_WORLD) all of which try to receive from any node for messages