>> For Heroic latencies on IB we would need to use small message RDMA and
>> poll each peers dedicated memory region for completion.
>
> Well, I tried to play around with the eager_limit, min_rdma, etc. I did
> not see the latency of messages of a given size be lowered by changing
> the tresholds
>
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Jean-Christophe Hugly wrote:
>
>> But should I understand from all this that the "direct" mode will
>> never
>> actually work ? It seems that if you need at least two transports,
>> then
>> none of them can be the hardwired unique one, right ? Unless there's a
>> bui
Troy,
I've been able to reproduce this. Should have this
corrected shortly.
Thanks,
Tim
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:38:03 -0700, Troy Telford
> wrote:
>
>> My mvapi config is using the Mellanox IB Gold 1.8 IB software release.
>> Kernel 2.6.5-7.201 (SLES 9 SP2)
>>
>> When I ran IMB using mvapi, I
Hello Troy,
We have very limited openib resources for testing at the moment. Can
you provide details on how to reproduce?
Thanks,
Tim
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:12:13 -0700, Jeff Squyres
> wrote:
>
>> At long last, 1.0rc5 is available for download. It fixes all known
>> issues reported here on t
