On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:55:01PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I've configured and built openmpi-1.8.5 on FreeBSD-11
> with
>
> % ./configure --prefix /usr/local/openmpi-1.8.5 --disable-shared \
>--enable-static --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default
>
Not necessarily a
I've configured and built openmpi-1.8.5 on FreeBSD-11
with
% ./configure --prefix /usr/local/openmpi-1.8.5 --disable-shared \
--enable-static --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default
This, of course, disables shared libraries and enables static
libs. Now, when I go to build my program, I see
% mak
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 04:03:51PM -0700, William Au wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for all responses. There is another problem using
> -fdefault-integer-8.
I'll make the unsolicited suggestion that you really
really really don't want to use the -fdefault-integer-8
option. It would be far b
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:27:13AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > (many lines removed)
> > checking prefix for function in .type... @
> > checking if .size is needed... yes
> > checking if .align directive
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:03:42AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:37:14AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:03:13PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > > Sorry -- I got distracted all afternoon...
> > >
> > > In additi
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:37:14AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:03:13PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > Sorry -- I got distracted all afternoon...
> >
> > In addition to what Ralph said (i.e., I'm not sure if the CIDR
> > notation stuff ma
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:03:13PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Sorry -- I got distracted all afternoon...
>
> In addition to what Ralph said (i.e., I'm not sure if the CIDR
> notation stuff made it over to the v1.5 branch or not, but it
> is available from the nightly SVN trunk tarballs:
> http:/
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:03:13PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Sorry -- I got distracted all afternoon...
No problem. We all have obligations that we prioritize.
> In addition to what Ralph said (i.e., I'm not sure if the
> CIDR notation stuff made it over to the v1.5 branch or not,
> but it is
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 04:26:35PM -0400, Gus Correa wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >>The easiest way to fix this is likely to use the btl_tcp_if_include
> >>or btl_tcp_if_exclude MCA parameters -- i.e.,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >
> > The easiest way to fix this is likely to use the btl_tcp_if_include
> > or btl_tcp_if_exclude MCA parameters -- i.e., tell OMPI exactly
> &
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
> The easiest way to fix this is likely to use the btl_tcp_if_include
> or btl_tcp_if_exclude MCA parameters -- i.e., tell OMPI exactly
> which interfaces to use:
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tcp#tcp-selection
>
Pe
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > It seems that openmpi-1.4.4 compiled code is trying to use the
> > wrong nic. My /etc/hosts file has
> >
> > 10.208.78.111 hpc.apl.washi
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:38:56PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:14:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> I have an application that appears to function as I expect
> >> when compiled with openmpi
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:14:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I have an application that appears to function as I expect
> when compiled with openmpi-1.4.2 on FreeBSD 9.0. But, it
> appears to hang during communication between nodes. What
> follows is the long version.
Argh I me
I have an application that appears to function as I expect
when compiled with openmpi-1.4.2 on FreeBSD 9.0. But, it
appears to hang during communication between nodes. What
follows is the long version.
I configure 1.4.2 with
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/openmpi-1.4.2 \
--enable-mpirun-prefi
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:01AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> If you're a Fortran MPI developer, I have a question for you.
>
> In the MPI-3 Forum, we're working on revamping the Fortran bindings to
> be "better" (for a variety of definitions of "better"). There's at
> least one question th
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:13:43PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >Thanks for looking into this issue. As a side note, FreeBSD 7.1
> >and higher has the cpuset_getaffinity/cpuset_setaffinity system
> >calls. I suspect th
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
>
> >Does OpenMPI know about the number of CPUS per node for FreeBSD?
> >
>
> This is exactly the right question: apparently it does not.
>
> Specifically, it looks like we have a bad
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:10:29PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
>
> >Does OpenMPI know about the number of CPUS per node for FreeBSD?
> >
>
> This is exactly the right question: apparently it does not.
>
> Specifically, it looks like we have a bad
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:23:45PM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> It isn't in a file - unless you specify it, OMPI will set it
> automatically based on the number of procs on the node vs. what OMPI
> thinks are the number of available processors. The question is: why
> does OMPI not correctly
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:40:13PM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I would really suggest looking at George's note first as I think you
> are chasing your tail here. It sounds like the most likely problem is
> that OMPI thinks you are oversubscribed and is setting sched_yield
> accordingly. whi
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:18:31PM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I spotted a strange value for the mpi_yield_when_idle MCA parameter. 1
> means your processor is oversubscribed, and this trigger a call to
> sched_yield after each check on the SM. Are you running the job
> oversub
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Did you rebuild 1.2.9? As I see you have static libraries, maybe there's
> a lurking phthread or something else that may have changed over time?
>
> DM
Yes. I downloaded 1.2.9, 1.3, and 1.3.1, all within minutes of each
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:10:21AM -0700, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >I can rebuild 1.2.9 and 1.3.1. Is there any particular configure
> >options that I should enable/disable?
>
> I hope someone else will chime in here, because I'm somewhat out of
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:39:20AM -0700, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Iain Bason wrote:
>
> >But maybe Steve should try 1.3.2 instead? Does that have your
> >improvements in it?
>
> 1.3.2 has the single-queue implementation and automatic sizing of the sm
> mmap file, both intended to fix problems at
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:00:39AM -0700, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Iain Bason wrote:
>
> >There are a bunch changes in the shared memory module between 1.2.9
> >and 1.3.1. One significant change is the introduction of the "sendi"
> >internal interface. I believe George Bosilca did the initial
>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:04:16PM -0700, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >I recently upgraded OpenMPI from 1.2.9 to 1.3 and then 1.3.1.
> >One of my colleagues reported a dramatic drop in performance
> >with one of his applications. My investigation shows a
Hi,
I recently upgraded OpenMPI from 1.2.9 to 1.3 and then 1.3.1.
One of my colleagues reported a dramatic drop in performance
with one of his applications. My investigation shows a factor
of 10 drop in communication over the memory bus. I've placed
a figure that iilustrates the problem at
htt
28 matches
Mail list logo
