Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-04-09 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Dear Gilles, I am using GCC (v9.3.0) as provided by Ubuntu 20.04. As I said only few test cases were in regression with the earlier patch, but this new patch resolves all of them. With Regards, S. Biplab Raut -Original Message- From: gil...@rist.or.jp Sent: Friday,

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-04-08 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Dear Gilles, As per your suggestion, I tried the inline patch as discussed in https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/8622#issuecomment-800776864 . This has fixed the regression completely for the remaining test cases in FFTW MPI in-built test bench - which was persisting even

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-14 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Dear Gilles, Reposting your comments along with my replies in the mailing-list for everybody to view/react. I am seeing some important performance degradation between Open MPI 3.1.1 and the top of the v3.1.x branch when running on a large number of cores. Same performan

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-12 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Dear Gilles, Please check my replies inline. >>> Can you please post the output of >>> ompi_info --param btl vader --level 3 >>> with both Open MPI 3.1 and 4.1? openMPI3.1.1 -- $ ompi_info --param btl vader --level 3 MCA btl: vader (MCA v2.1.0,

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-08 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
. Biplab Raut From: users On Behalf Of Raut, S Biplab via users Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 5:37 PM To: Gilles Gouaillardet Cc: Raut, S Biplab ; Open MPI Users Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ? [CAUTION: External Email] Dear Gilles

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-07 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
> otherwise vader will default to using CMA. This will provide the best > possible performance. > > -Nathan > > On Mar 4, 2021, at 5:55 AM, Raut, S Biplab via users > mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: > > [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution O

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-06 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=MOIgiiQ5J9qIaD7uBjCbPkuAOhioSxLiyDQbOJspGAU%3D&reserved=0). > You will need to build with —with-xpmem=/path/to/xpmem to use xpmem > otherwise vader will default to using CMA. This will provide the best > possible performance. > > -Nathan > > On M

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-04 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
:55 AM, Raut, S Biplab via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] It is a single node execution, so it should be using shared memory (vader). With Regards, S. Biplab Raut From: Heinz, Michael William mailto:michael.will

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-04 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ? [CAUTION: External Email] What interconnect are you using at run time? That is, are you using Ethernet or InfiniBand or Omnipath? Sent from my iPad On Mar 4, 2021, at 5:05 AM, Raut, S Biplab via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>>

Re: [OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-04 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
d%7C0%7C0%7C637504431443238327%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=2IHJOyMgRxibyqNNOG7sSob%2FNucGcWlkOH47mnTfdA4%3D&reserved=0> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 07:35, Raut, S Biplab via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Dear Exp

[OMPI users] Stable and performant openMPI version for Ubuntu20.04 ?

2021-03-03 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Dear Experts, Until recently, I was using openMPI3.1.1 to run single node 128 ranks MPI application on Ubuntu18.04 and Ubuntu19.04. But, now the OS on these machines are upgraded to Ubuntu20.04, and I have been observin

Re: [OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size

2020-03-26 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Thank you Jeff and George for your enlightening comments and inputs !! I will design my application algorithm appropriately. With Regards, S. Biplab Raut From: George Bosilca Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 8:00 PM To: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) Cc: Raut, S Biplab ; Open MPI User's List Subject:

Re: [OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size

2020-03-26 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
(jsquyres) Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:22 PM To: Open MPI User's List Cc: George Bosilca ; Raut, S Biplab Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size [CAUTION: External Email] On Mar 25, 2020, at 4:49 AM, Raut, S Biplab via users

Re: [OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size

2020-03-26 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
change this limit to adapt to the needs of your application(s). Hope this answers your question, George. On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:46 AM Raut, S Biplab via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: Dear Experts, I would like to derive/calculate the maximum MPI

Re: [OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size

2020-03-25 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
this limit to adapt to the needs of your application(s). Hope this answers your question, George. On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:46 AM Raut, S Biplab via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: Dear Experts, I would like to derive/calculate the maximum MPI send m

[OMPI users] Regarding eager limit relationship to send message size

2020-03-23 Thread Raut, S Biplab via users
Dear Experts, I would like to derive/calculate the maximum MPI send message size possible given the known details of btl_vader_eager_limit and number of ranks. Can anybody explain and confirm on this? With Regards, S. Biplab Raut