Re: [OMPI users] Parallel I/O with MPI-1

2008-07-23 Thread Neil Storer
why? It's > already done in the MPI-IO implementation. > > FWIW: I do not believe that flock() is guaranteed to be safe across > network filesystems such as NFS. > -- +-+

Re: [O-MPI users] [Beowulf] MPI ABI

2005-10-12 Thread Neil Storer
PGI and ABSOFT Fortran compilers for example. Regards Neil -- +-+-+--+ | Neil Storer |Head: Systems S/W Section| Operations Dept. | +-+-+--+ | ECMWF

Re: [O-MPI users] [Fwd: Re: The case for an MPI ABI]

2005-03-21 Thread Neil Storer
s probably set up in the "configure" stage, and as such would be set to "+1" for Portland and "-1" for Pathscale. So you see my original comment does still hold. *You have to be very careful coding and using an ABI.* Regards Neil Greg Lindahl wrote:

Re: [O-MPI users] [Fwd: Re: The case for an MPI ABI]

2005-03-17 Thread Neil Storer
an example where you have to be very careful coding and using an ABI.* Regards Neil -- +-+-+------+ | Neil Storer |Head: Systems S/W Section

[O-MPI users] Thread-safety and daemon initiation

2005-02-15 Thread Neil Storer
-MPI's "lamboot" (rsh/ssh) to start daemons on other nodes or is there a different mechanism altogether? Regards Neil Storer -- +-+-+------+ | Neil Storer |Head: Systems S/W Section|