Hello,
Is there a correct order to call both functions MPI_Unplish_name and
MPI_Close_port?
May we have
MPI_Unplish_name
MPI_Close_port
or
MPI_Close_port
MPI_Unplish_name
thank you
Hello,
I have a process that creates other processes at different times (using
MPI_Comm_spawn). After, the initial process (creator of other processes) must
receive mesagens of created processes. However, there are one intercommunicator
for each created process.
The question is: how to unite
After a read: http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/more_traffic/
I understood that if a large message is sent and then a short message is sent,
then the short message can reach before. But what if the messages have the same
size, and are small enough so that no fragmentation occurs, the ordering
I would like to know if the MPI is a FIFO (first in first out) channel, ie, if
the A message is sent before of the B message, then, MPI garantees that A will
be received before B in the recipient.
Does the MPI guarantee that A always will be received first?
Or may B be received first sometimes?
A
Hello,
Traduzir do: português
Digite um texto ou
endereço de um site ou traduza um
documento.
Cancelar
Tradução do português
para inglês
I have three processes that communicate with each other. The first process
creates the other two processes (using MPI_Comm_spaw (...)).
When one of the proc