That worked out. Thank you!
On 04/07/18 19:26, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
Try adding PMIX_MCA_ptl_base_verbose=10 to your environment
On Jul 4, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Maksym Planeta
wrote:
Thanks for quick response,
I tried this out and I do get more output: https://pastebin.com/JkXAYdM4. But
Thanks for quick response,
I tried this out and I do get more output:
https://pastebin.com/JkXAYdM4. But the line I need does not appear in
the output.
On 04/07/18 17:38, Nathan Hjelm via users wrote:
--mca pmix_base_verbose 100
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
ts to configure mca parameters properly failed.
Could you help me with the exact parameters to force the
pmix_output_verbose be active?
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
___
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ch is not recognized by PMIx. PMIx is looking for
PMIX_MCA_ptl_tcp_remote_connections. The only way to set PMIx MCA params for the
code embedded in OMPI is to put them in your environment
On Jun 19, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Maksym Planeta
wrote:
But what about remote connections parameter? Why is i
node). This is always done over the
loopback device since it is a purely local connection that is never used for
MPI messages.
I’m sure that the tcp/btl is using your indicated subnet as that would be used
for internode messages.
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
What is more boggling is that if I attache with a debugger at
opal/mca/pmix/pmix3x/pmix/src/mca/ptl/tcp/ptl_tcp_components.c around line 500
I see that mca_ptl_tcp_component.remote_connections is false. This means that
the way I set up component paramete
by any chance, would you be able to test the latest openmpi 2.1.2rc3 ?
OpenMPI 2.1.0 is the latest on our cluster.
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
hance, would you be able to test the latest openmpi 2.1.2rc3 ?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On 9/8/2017 4:19 PM, Maksym Planeta wrote:
>> Indeed mpirun shows slots=1 per node, but I create allocation with
>> --ntasks-per-node 24, so I do have all co
we respect the RM
> regardless of what you say in the hostfile. You can check this by adding
> --display-allocation to your cmd line. You probably need to tell slurm to
> allocate more cpus/node.
>
>
>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 3:33 AM, Maksym Planeta
>> wrote:
>>
>&g
uot;
Also there is SLURM installed with version "slurm
16.05.7-Bull.1.1-20170512-1252"
Could you help me to enforce OpenMPI to respect slots paremeter?
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users ma
--mca btl_tcp_if_include 172.24.44.0/23 ...
if you are still facing some issues, you can
mpirun ... --mca btl_base_verbose 100 ...
in order to collect (lot of) logs
Cheers,
Gilles
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Maksym Planeta
wrote:
Dear Gilles,
thank you for quick response.
pml/cm doesn&#
>
> you can try
> mpirun --mca pml ob1 --mca btl tcp,self ...
>
>
> pml/cm has a higher priority than pml/ob1, so if you have a mtl that
> fits your network (such as mtl/mxm),
> then pml/ob1 will be ignored, and the list of allowed/excluded btl
> become insignificant.
>
>
difference in behavior.
--
Regards,
Maksym Planeta
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/users
13 matches
Mail list logo
