Matthieu,
I see your point, if I avoid calling mpi_test or wait, there is no data
transfer at all.
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
> If you don't need to know if the data was transferred or not, then why do
> you transfe
ogram smoothly.
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Lei Shi wrote:
> >
> > P.S. Pavan suggests me to use MPI_Request_free. I will give it a try.
>
> Keep in mind that you have
.
Can I use MPI_Irecv with MPI_Ibsend or I need to pair MPI_Ibsend with the
blocking MPI_Recv function?
P.S. Pavan suggests me to use MPI_Request_free. I will give it a try.
Thanks for your reply and suggestions.
Best,
Lei Shi
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Jef
data)
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you have to call either Wait or Test to make the communications
> move forward in the general case. Some hardware may have a hardware thread
> that makes the communicat
Hello,
I want to use buffered sends. Read a blog said it is evil,
http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/top-10-reasons-why-buffered-sends-are-evil
Is it true or not? Thanks!
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
. Thanks.
Sincerely Yours,
Lei Shi
-
