Re: [OMPI users] Mapping, binding and ranking

2021-03-01 Thread John R Cary via users
, 2021, at 7:13 AM, Luis Cebamanos via users mailto:users@lists.open-mpi.org>> wrote: Hi John, I would be interested to know if that does what you are expecting... On 01/03/2021 00:02, John R Cary via users wrote: I've been watching this exchange with interest, because it is the c

Re: [OMPI users] Mapping, binding and ranking

2021-02-28 Thread John R Cary via users
I've been watching this exchange with interest, because it is the closest I have seen to what I want, but I want something slightly different: 2 processes per node, with the first one bound to one core, and the second bound to all the rest, with no use of hyperthreads. Would this be --map-by ppr

[OMPI users] Do -cpu-set or -cpu-list work? Or is there a better way to use rankfile?

2021-02-21 Thread John R Cary via users
Do -cpu-set or -cpu-list work?  Or is there a better way to use rankfile? I have a cluster with 24-cores and 1 GPU per node.  I would like to have one core drive the GPU and the other 23 to be used thread-parallel with OpenMP.  My setup is described in my just-previous email to this list: CentOS

Re: [OMPI users] OMPI_Affinity_str returning empty strings

2021-02-21 Thread John R Cary via users
n 2/21/21 6:56 AM, John R Cary via users wrote: OMPI_Affinity_str returning empty strings I am trying to understand the affinities chosen by OpenMPI following the documentation of https://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v4.0/man3/OMPI_Affinity_str.3.php CentOS-8.2, gcc-8.3, openmpi-4.0.5 $ which mpirun ~/om

[OMPI users] OMPI_Affinity_str returning empty strings

2021-02-21 Thread John R Cary via users
OMPI_Affinity_str returning empty strings I am trying to understand the affinities chosen by OpenMPI following the documentation of https://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v4.0/man3/OMPI_Affinity_str.3.php CentOS-8.2, gcc-8.3, openmpi-4.0.5 $ which mpirun ~/ompi/contrib-gcc830/openmpi-4.0.5-shared/bin/mpir

Re: [OMPI users] 3.0.4, 4.0.1 build failure on OSX Mojave with LLVM

2019-04-24 Thread John R. Cary via users
Hi George, Just to make sure I am communicating On 4/24/2019 9:25 AM, George Bosilca wrote: The configure AC_HEADER_STDC macro is considered obsolete [1] as most of the OSes are STDC compliant nowadays. Thanks.  I read that and wonder why it is used if obsolete? To have it failing on a r

Re: [OMPI users] 3.0.4, 4.0.1 build failure on OSX Mojave with LLVM

2019-04-23 Thread John R. Cary via users
..? More below. On Apr 23, 2019, at 6:26 PM, John R. Cary via users wrote: The failure is In file included from /Users/cary/projects/ulixesall-llvm/builds/openmpi-4.0.1/nodl/../ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype_external.c:29: In file included from /Users/cary/projects/ulixesall-llvm/builds/openmpi-4.0

[OMPI users] 3.0.4, 4.0.1 build failure on OSX Mojave with LLVM

2019-04-23 Thread John R. Cary via users
The failure is In file included from /Users/cary/projects/ulixesall-llvm/builds/openmpi-4.0.1/nodl/../ompi/datatype/ompi_datatype_external.c:29: In file included from /Users/cary/projects/ulixesall-llvm/builds/openmpi-4.0.1/nodl/../ompi/communicator/communicator.h:38: In file included from