Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote:
Ok, after all the considerations, I'll try Boost, today, make some
experiments and see if I can use it or if I'll avoid it yet.
But as said by Raimond I think, the problem is been dependent of a
rich-incredible-amazing-toolset but still implementing only MPI-1
Terry Frankcombe wrote:
I understand Luis' position completely. He wants an MPI program, not a
program that's written in some other environment, no matter how
attractive that may be. It's like the difference between writing a
numerical program in standard-conforming Fortran and writing it in
Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote:
Your suggestion is a great and interesting idea. I only have the fear to
get used to the Boost and could not get rid of Boost anymore, because
one thing is sure the abstraction added by Boost is impressive, it turn
the things much less painful like MPI to be imple
Luis Vitorio Cargnini wrote:
just one additional and if I have:
vector< vector > x;
How to use the MPI_Send
MPI_Send(&x[0][0], x[0].size(),MPI_DOUBLE, 2, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD);
?
Vitorio,
The standard provides no information on where the different parts of
the data will be, relative to
e tests run during library development and documented
with the library)
John Phillips
