s
Link to this post:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2014/08/24921.php
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
Hi,
On Feb 21, Jeff Squyres announced Open MPI 1.6.4. However,
on the Open MPI home page, 1.6.3 is still indicated as the
current release. Going to the download page shows 1.6.4 as
the current release, so I think the problem is isolated to
the home page. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David
vailable.
I've just quickly scanned the MCA parameters:
ompi_info --param all all
and couldn't find the answer to my question.
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley
Hi Ralph,
Sorry for the false alarm, and thanks for the tip:
... version confusion where the mpirun being used doesn't match the backend
daemons.
Yes, my test environment was wonky. All is well now.
On May 14, 2012, at 3:41 PM, David Turner wrote:
...
[c0667:24962] [[39579,
INIT failed for some reason; ...
I can provide additional details if needed, but again: I did nothing
different than what I have done with previous OMPI and compiler
releases. Thoughts? Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division
Hi all,
Currently getting "You don't have permission to access / on this
server" on the www.open-mpi-org website.
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
egory? Or the "shared memory" category? Or the "troubleshooting"
category?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On
Behalf Of David Turner
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 1:38 AM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI use
11 2:37 AM, David Turner wrote:
% df /tmp
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
- 12330084 822848 11507236 7% /
% df /
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
- 12330084 822848 11507236 7% /
That works out to 11GB. But...
The compute nodes have 24GB. Freshly booted, abou
very much, exactly what I wanted to hear. How big is /tmp?
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On
Behalf Of David Turner
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 6:36 PM
To: us...@open-mpi.org
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] EXTERNAL: Re: How to set up
___
users mailing list
us...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
that thread, and
didn't see any update, so I passed on the info myself.
--
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berk
of Open MPI!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
ted by orted, and therefore inherit its limits. Is there
any sort of orted configuration that can help here? Any other
thoughts about how to approach this?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-40
sses are
started by orted, and therefore inherit its limits. Is there
any sort of orted configuration that can help here? Any other
thoughts about how to approach this?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510)
likely that you compiled Open MPI with --enable-static and/or
--disable-dlopen. In this case, all of Open MPI's plugins are slurped up into
the libraries themselves (e.g., libmpi.so or libmpi.a). That's why everything
continues to work properly.
On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:58 PM, David Tur
for mca_btl_openib.so,
to no avail. And yet, 1.4.2 seems to work "fine". Is my
installation broken, or is the organization significantly
different between the two versions? A quick scan of the
release notes didn't help.
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Gro
ng Open MPI with PGI 10.8, is there any
(safe, reliable) way to get the compiler wrappers to link
against the PGI 10.8 libraries? Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
50 PM, David Turner wrote:
Hi,
Recently, Christopher Maestas reported a problem with -npernode in
Open MPI 1.4.2 ("running a ompi 1.4.2 job with -np versus -npernode").
I have also encountered this problem, with a simple "hello, world"
program:
% mpirun -np 16 ./a.out
myran
eed more information. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
Hi all,
Please verify: if using openib BTL, the only threading model
is MPI_THREAD_SINGLE?
Is there a timeline for full support of MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE
in Open MPI's openib BTL?
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Div
s. The above
option would prevent that, correct?
Does that solve the problem?
I'll give it a try and let you know. Thanks!
Ralph
On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:28 PM, David Turner wrote:
Hi,
Our cluster has a handful of login nodes, and then a bunch of
compute nodes. OpenMPI is installed in a g
e a way to explicitly exclude hosts from consideration
for mpirun? To prevent (what is usually accidental) running
MPI apps on our login nodes? Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Lab
it matters, resource allocation is via torque.
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
Hi Ralph
> ... that is fixed in the upcoming 1.4.2 release.
Can you say when this release will be generally available?
Proliferating session directories are a problem for us too.
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division ph
olks there
and get a copy of their epilog script.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 1:42 AM, David Turner wrote:
Hi all,
Running on a large cluster of 8-core nodes. I understand
that the SM BTL is a "good thing". But I'm curious about
its use of memory-mapped files. I believe these files w
es and epilogues, just
haven't implemented them yet. Even if I can find and fix a
reason why OMPI is currently not doing this, we will probably
do it an epilogue anyway.
Thanks for your help!
On Mar 1, 2010, at 1:42 AM, David Turner wrote:
Hi all,
Running on a large cluster of 8-core nodes.
BTL even within a node? Of course, the "self"
BTL should still be used if appropriate.
Any thoughts clarifying these issues would be
greatly appreciated. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 48
.ofed1.4.2.x86_64.rpm
tgt-0.1-20080828.x86_64.rpm
tgt-generic-debuginfo-0.1-20080828.x86_64.rpm
tvflash-0.9.0-1.ofed1.4.2.x86_64.rpm
tvflash-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.ofed1.4.2.x86_64.rpm
Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone
get everything about autogen.sh and just apply the
attached patch.
Thanks; I was able to complete the make process using the provided
patch.
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
me error!
Any suggestions? Let me know if I should provide full copies of the
configure and make output. Thanks!
--
Best regards,
David Turner
User Services Groupemail: dptur...@lbl.gov
NERSC Division phone: (510) 486-4027
Lawrence Berkeley Labfax: (510) 486-4316
30 matches
Mail list logo