On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Jeff Hammond
wrote:
>
>> > BTW: is there a reason you don't want to just use the C datatypes? The
>> fundamental output of the index is an integer value -- casting it to a
>> float of some flavor doesn't fundamentally change its value.
>>
>> The code in question
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:46 PM, Brian Taylor
wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation, Jeff. I'm not surprised to hear that using
a Fortran type from C in this manner is potentially buggy and not
portable.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Brian Taylor
wrote:
> >
> > I have a question about the standards compliance of OpenMPI. Is the
following program valid according to the MPI standard?
> >
> > #incl
I have a question about the standards compliance of OpenMPI. Is the
following program valid according to the MPI standard?
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int rank;
double in[2], out[2];
MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
in[1] = in[0]
;
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Brian Taylor wrote:
>
> > Actually, there is an unofficial processor affinity API on Mac OS X,
> > but it is supplied only with the CHUD framework. I suppose as a
> > further barrier to using this API in code outside of App
Actually, there is an unofficial processor affinity API on Mac OS X,
but it is supplied only with the CHUD framework. I suppose as a
further barrier to using this API in code outside of Apple, the header
files for this API are only available with the standalone CHUD
installer. See:
http://lists.a